Tero International, Inc. Your Elite Training Team
Tero International, Inc. Your Elite Training Team
The meaning of any communication is determined by more than the content of the message. The way a message's content is framed affects its meaning. The frame, in fact, is so powerful that it can even reverse the meaning of the content.
Social scientists' perceptions and their empirical findings demonstrate that the same information, when presented with a positive or negative frame, can elicit different reactions. Researchers refer to this phenomenon as the "framing effect," which is defined as:
"The framing effect is a cognitive bias that distorts our decisions and judgments based on how information is presented or 'framed.' This effect isn't about lying or twisting the truth. It's about the same cold, hard facts making us think and act differently just by changing their packaging." (Framing Effect)
The framing effect shows how the way information is presented can influence how people think, feel, and respond. For example, saying "90% of patients recover" appears hopeful, while "10% do not recover" feels discouraging — even though both statements share the same fact. How patients react and the decisions they make about their health may depend more on how the information is framed than on the actual facts. How and why framing works is explained by the “Framing Theory.”
Erving Goffman's Frame Analysis (1974) developed and provided the framework for understanding how individuals and groups create meanings, or "frames," that influence their judgment and perceptions.
Robert Entman (1993) further developed the Framing Theory by defining it as the process of "selecting and emphasizing certain aspects of reality to make them more salient," which influences how messages are interpreted. He demonstrated that framing is more than just a communication tool—it impacts people's judgments and perceptions of the communication (Entman, R. M. 1993). Thus, we might call it a meaning tool.
Framing is a highly popular human interaction, particularly in healthcare, advertising, politics, and leadership. Intentional or not, it influences opinions. Understanding how framing shapes perception becomes even clearer when we examine its influence on decisions in everyday contexts.
Research proves that positive framing encourages constructive action and confidence more effectively than messages focused on loss or risk. According to the American Psychological Association:
"… the practice of presenting information or messages in a way that emphasizes beneficial aspects and creates a favorable impression. This approach can influence how audiences perceive and respond to messages, highlighting the good rather than the negative." (Positive Framing)
Several research studies provide empirical evidence:
The framing of various medical treatments directly influences patients' decision-making, risk-taking, and willingness to follow recommended treatment options.
A study involving 95 volunteers found that a positive message, such as "7 out of 10 will not experience nausea," was more effective in reducing reported nausea than a negative one: "3 out of 10 will experience nausea." Such communication influenced treatment acceptance. (Oxford Academic, 2017)
In public health campaigns, positive messages, such as "Eating fruits boosts energy," are more persuasive than the negative warnings, such as "Not eating fruits increases disease risk." (Rothman & Salovey, 1997). Such studies demonstrate that positive framing reduces patient anxiety, fosters trust, offers coping options, and enhances patient involvement in decision-making. Beyond healthcare, framing also plays a key role in how consumers evaluate products and make buying decisions.
Framing in advertising and marketing can significantly influence consumers' behavior and decisions. While positive framing creates a favorable impression and encourages acceptance of a product, negative framing often leads to rejection.
A research study advertisement divided ground beef into two groups: one labeled "75% lean" and the other "25% fat." Participants responded more favorably to the label of "75% lean" than to "25% fat." (Framing Effect on Consumers)
Such actions show how the brain processes information. "Positively framed messages tend to activate reward centers, while negatively framed messages trigger threat-detection systems in the amygdala." (Marketing Psychology). For consumers, positive framing is risk aversion, value investment, and increased trust in products. Framing becomes even more influential when applied to public issues, where subtle shifts in wording can significantly alter large-scale attitudes.
In politics, framing statements positively is crucial for shaping opinions, building support, and advancing agendas. Emphasizing benefits or progress—such as promoting climate policy as 'creating green jobs' instead of 'restricting emissions'—leaves a favorable impression and encourages acceptance. Ted Brader's experiments demonstrated that emotional appeals generate optimism, motivate voters, and increase the favorability of candidates. (Campaigning for Hearts and Minds, 2006)
Research by Nelson, Clawson, and Oxley (Civil Liberties Conflict,1997) confirms that small changes in news framing influence citizens' evaluations, tolerance, and perceptions. However, positive effects make strong impressions when audiences lack firm opinions, while fixed views hinder change.
An outstanding example of the social impact of positive reframing is the U.S. marriage equality movement. Advocates moved from a legal-rights narrative, "stop banning gay marriages," to a values-based one, "celebrating love and fairness." Thus, positive change transformed public opinion and policy. (Stanford Social Innovation Review). In organizational settings, framing moves from influencing individual decisions to shaping culture, collaboration, and trust.
In leadership, framing becomes a tool for shaping meaning—helping teams understand challenges, align around priorities, and stay motivated. A positive message encourages growth, empowers employees, and builds confidence, while negative framing highlights threats or failures, lowering morale.
One such example is provided by Jacinda Ardern, the former Prime Minister of New Zealand, during the COVID-19 pandemic. She used phrases like "team of five million" to foster unity, trust, and solidarity among her team. (Leadership, 2021). Satya Nadella also transformed Microsoft's culture by shifting from a "know-it-all" to a "learn-it-all" mindset, fostering curiosity and collaboration. (Satya-Nadella, 2025).
These examples prove that when information is framed around opportunity rather than threat, people respond with greater achievement and initiative. Positive framing should not be confused with manipulation. Its goal is to highlight constructive perspectives while remaining truthful. It presents the same facts in a way that supports clarity, confidence, and informed decision-making.
Multiple instances of positive framing in team leadership and daily communication demonstrate that it significantly influences perceptions, messages, and overall results. Positive framing boosts confidence, optimism, and motivation, while negative framing causes resistance, fear, and feelings of loss.
Click on the image below to purchase your personal copy or gift for someone.
